You are here

Missing Persons (Part 1): Claudia’s Law and the Guardianship Act

Karen Bright's picture
Published: 05/09/19 - Country: United Kingdom

Even in today’s society of CCTV and other surveillance methods, reported incidents of missing persons in England and Wales are increasing. On 31st July 2019 the Guardianship (Missing Persons) Act 2017 (“the 2017 Act”) came into force. This is also known as Claudia’s Law after Claudia Lawrence who disappeared on 18th March 2009.

Claudia’s father Peter has campaigned for changes to the law to assist family members and loved ones of missing persons, so that they can take guardianship of that person’s financial affairs much sooner than previously possible. The previous lack of power for family members and loved ones to take over a missing person’s affairs could lead to unintended circumstances such as repossession of that person’s home or insolvency. This is particularly problematic where there are dependants who need to be provided for.

Prior 31st July 2019 the only option available was to apply to the High Court for a Declaration of Presumed Death under the Presumption of Death Act 2013. However, in the absence of evidence that the missing person has died, a family may have to wait 7 years before it can pursue a declaration. This is a very long time to wait where the missing person’s affairs are not being dealt with, for example mortgage repayments may not be made, any life insurance policy cannot be paid out and money held in a bank account is likely to be frozen.

Claudia’s Law creates a new legal status of ‘Guardians of the affairs of a missing person’ which will allow the families to act as guardian of a missing person where that person has been missing for 90 days or longer for a period of 4 years with an option to extend. An application will need to be made to the High Court to appoint the Guardian and if successful it will allow family members and loved ones to step in and safeguard the missing person’s financial interests. The aim is that these new powers will reduce the financial and administrative burden on families. It should also enable banks and other third parties to be able to discuss the missing person’s affairs without fear of breaching confidentiality or data protection laws.

Applications for Guardianship orders can only be made by persons over 18 who can demonstrate that they have a ‘sufficient interest’ in the property or financial affairs of the missing person. The missing person’s personal representatives, spouse, civil partner, parent, child and siblings are automatically considered to have sufficient interest. The Court must be satisfied that the appointment will be in the missing person’s best interests and that appointed guardian(s) will act in the best interests of the missing person. The 2017 Act also aims to ensure that the missing person’s assets and interests are protected from abuse.

Claudia’s Law addresses an anomaly in the law that not many are not aware of, it seeks to abate the financial stress that families face in these tragic circumstances and give them practical powers, whilst balancing the need to properly protect a missing person’s interests whilst they are absent.

Subscribe to The Journal

* indicates required
Areas of Interest

Pragma International will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at We will treat your information with respect. For more information about our privacy practices please visit our website. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Article Rating: 
Average: 4.2 (6 votes)
Total reads: 567
Karen Bright's picture

Karen’s general litigation caseload sees her instructed regularly in matters that cover the range of the court hierarchy, from County Courts, the High Court and the Court of Appeal. In terms of subject-matter, these disputes have involved terms and conditions, the standard of works and services provided, disputes between directors and shareholders, contentious probate, ownership of goods, nuisance, professional negligence and contractual disputes.

Karen has had conduct of two matters that went before the Court of Appeal. One related to tree root nuisance, and the other to the setting aside of a freezing order.

She has particular expertise in conducting Landlord and Tenant litigation in the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and County Courts. This includes acting for both landlords and tenants in issues such as the forfeiture of leases, injunctions, nuisance, recovery of service charges and rent, and possession work.

In the insolvency arena, Karen’s expertise applies to both personal and corporate insolvency, often acting for the Liquidator or Trustee in Bankruptcy. Her work in this field includes asset tracing, applications to set aside transactions at undervalue, advice on preferential payments, the compulsory winding up of companies and the issuing and defending of bankruptcy petitions.

Karen trained at Machins Solicitors before working at Wedlake Saint (now part of Penningtons LLP) before joining Bishop and Sewell LLP.

Areas of Practice

Economic Sectors