You are here

Sustainability in the Fashion Industry: Kering Group’s Innovative Approach in the Luxury Sphere

Rebecca Harris's picture


Retailers are facing an increasing population of ethically minded consumers. A Nielsen 2015 global survey found that 66% of respondents were “willing to pay more for products and services that come from companies that are committed to positive social and environmental impact,” up from 55% in 2014. The report also found that 73% of global millennials are willing to pay extra for sustainable products, an increase from 50% in 2014. Another 2014 study found that 81 percent of millennials expect companies to commit publicly to good corporate citizenship. Generation Z—the generation born between the mid-1990s and early 2000s—are even moreenvironmentally and socially aware than millennials, and we have witnessed the strength of their convictions over the past two weeks.

The retail manufacturing industry, the second most polluting industry behind the oil industry, will be expected to meet the preferences of these consumers by developing long-term, industry-wide sustainable and ethical practices. This growing young generation of consumers will call out companies on social media that are not fully transparent or “merely pay lip service” to corporate social responsibility.

Some luxury brands have resisted this call for transparency. As the fashion industry has faced increasing scrutiny over its social and environment impact, these brands have hidden “behind sepia-tinted marketing images of craftsmanship,” suggesting they do not contribute to the pollution associated with mass production. Luxury brands also play up the “the necessity of confidentiality—for example, many won’t reveal the exact location of their factories.” Luxury brands typically do not collaborate to develop sustainable materials; “for Haute couturiers, the exclusivity of the materials is as crucial as the exclusivity of the designs.” Some fashion houses will “go as far as acquiring heritage ateliers and fabric mills to ensure the uniqueness of their creations.”

One exception is Kering, a global luxury group composed of luxury fashion houses including Gucci, Balenciaga, Alexander McQueen, and Stella McCartney. Kering is committed to bringing transparency and collaboration to the luxury sphere. Marie Claire Deveu, Kering’s chief sustainability officer, highlights that Kering has taken on the “responsibility not only to educate its own designers but also to let its competitors benefit from that research too, in the hope that peer pressure will force change.”

Kering’s commitment to transparency will benefit its competitors as well as non-luxury brands. For example, Kering developed a new approach to producing leather—which traditionally causes horrific damage to the environment and nearby communities—and shared each step of this approach, “herd to handbag,” with its rivals. Additionally, Kering created and made available to the public an app for designers called “My EP&L.” My EP&L calculates the environmental cost of a design—comparing carbon emissions, pollution, and waste—depending on the raw materials and manufacturing locations proposed for each design.

While its approach may be less competitive than its peers, Kering hopes to profit from its transparency with its investors. Kering makes all of its sustainable targets public in detailed reports alongside it financial results. Investment analysts and shareholders are taking notice of the fact that ethical considerations are part of a brands profitability, and “are taking a closer interest in, say, how ethically sound a luxury brand’s snake farm or cotton field is.”

We are a global services company with local knowledge.
We meet You wherever You are and lead You wherever You want.
Ask us how

Article Rating: 
Average: 4.2 (6 votes)
Total reads: 822
Rebecca Harris's picture

As an Associate in the Firm's Litigation Group, Rebecca Harris handles a range of disputes.

While in law school, Rebecca served as an executive technical editor for the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review and as a line editor for the Harvard Journal of Law and Gender. She was also a Rappaport Fellow in Law and Public Policy and co-chair of Harvard Law School Lambda's Political Committee. Rebecca spent two years working as a research and teaching assistant for Professor Jeannie Suk Gersen, and her research responsibilities included a focus on Title IX enforcement and campus sexual assault policies. 

Also while in law school, Rebecca interned at the Massachusetts Executive Office of Public Safety and Security, where she spearheaded a project to develop a diversity awareness program for individuals convicted of hate crimes. 

Prior to attending law school, Rebecca spent five years working as a Victim Witness Advocate at the Suffolk County District Attorney's Office, with assignments in the Child Protection and Senior Trial Units. 


Intellectual property litigation and class action employment litigation are the focal points of Jennifer Furey’s legal practice. As a director in the firm’s Litigation group, she represents individuals and businesses with intellectual property matters concerning utility and design patents, trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, false advertising and copyrights, and with high-stakes class action employment litigation matters. Jennifer has tried numerous cases to verdict and has successfully obtained summary judgment on behalf of clients in both employment litigation and intellectual property matters. Prior to joining Goulston & Storrs, Jennifer was a partner at a litigation boutique law firm in Boston.